Wahshi Bāfqi
Why?
Apercu Discussion
Join
If truly You were in need of nothing,
then luring the hearts
Why?
Such demand teasing and seducing every heart and life
Why?
If Your beauty conquers not the dominion of hearts at last
Marching the militia of afflictions against the fiefdom of endurance
Why?
I have a problem I must ask You or perhaps from Your friends
Manifesting such splendid beauty while forbidding the gazes
Why?
Is the fault-finding for the lover allowed in the religion of goodness
and purity?
Then what was the crime of our eyes and to block the Divine Beauty
Why?
Caused by Your designs and thus I am so potent with loving
While I am ridden with shortcomings blaming the scandals upon me
Why?
I am running after the startled deer hurriedly
No one may blame me for
constantly tracking
the valley
Why?
If the companions were not always so rough with me
Then Wahshi reclusive in a corner all gloomy
Why?
End.
Apercu
I think Richard Feyman has
already said the best commentary
for this poem:
The next reason that you might
think you do not understand
what I am telling you is, while I am describing to you how
Nature works,
you won't understand why Nature works that way. But you
see, nobody
understands that. I can't explain why Nature behaves in this peculiar
way. [1]
What I am going to tell you
about is what we teach our
physics students in the third or fourth year of graduate school-and you
think
I'm going to explain it to you so you can understand it? No, you're not
going
to be able to understand it. Why, then, am I going to bother you with
all this?
Why are you going to sit here all this time, when you won't be able to
understand what I am going to say? It is my task to convince you not
to
turn away because you don't understand it. You see, my physics students
don't
understand it either. That is because I
don't understand it. Nobody
does. [2]
It is not a question of
whether a theory is philosophically
delightful, or easy to understand, or perfectly reasonable from the
point of
view of common sense. The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes
Nature as
absurd from the point of view of common sense. And it agrees fully with
experiment. [3]
Excerpts from "QED: The
Strange Theory of Light and Matter".
[1] The
Creator gave Mankind the
faculty of cognition for
words such as WHY for the purposes of dealing with his daily life to
deal with
rudimentary activities. Feynman and Wahshi teach us no way you will
understand
WHY! If you cannot understand the WHY for the behavior of Electron then
no way
you comprehend WHY for the actions of our Beloved Creator.
[2] The best estimate the cosmologists
and physicists have
for the age of the universe is about 11 billion years. Tell me how can
you
comprehend and describe the Creator ITself and ITs actions in few
years of
your short life? Feynman tells us that even he does not understand what
he is
teaching the students of Physics. He means, perhaps we have a language
capable
of expressing words or equations or numbers, we can follow through and
deducing
some final results of how things are, but no way we comprehend most of
what they
mean.
[3] Sufism is not about making common
sense, it is about
describing WHAT IS in PRESENT in front of your face in great details.
No Sufi
master demands that you like what they said or make sense of what they
said. What
they asked of you was to describe with clarity HOW THINGS ARE IN YOUR
LIFE!
©
2003-2002,
Dara O. Shayda